NYCLU & OTHERS SUE SYRACUSE FOR PUTTING KIDS IN SOLITARY – AND WIN
On June 26, 2017, the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) and the Legal Services of Central New York (LSCNY) announced a settlement with the Onondaga County (New York) Sheriffs Department and the Syracuse School District that would prevent youth from being placed in solitary confinement unless “there is an imminent safety threat that less restrictive measures cannot adequately resolve.” In such emergency cases, isolation will last for only the minimum time necessary to resolve imminent safety concerns.
In September, 2016, the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) and the Legal Services of Central New York (LSCNY) sued Onondaga County, NY (Syracuse) for keeping youth in solitary confinement for up to 23 hours a day in the Onondaga County Justice Center, an adult jail. In the lawsuit, V.W. et al. v. Conway, the NYCLU alleges that, between October 2015 and October 2016, the Onondaga County Justice Center put at least 86 youth in small isolation cells more than 250 times where they were subjected to abuse, threats, and physical violence from staff and adult inmates.Youth were placed in urine covered cells next to adults, often for actions as minor as speaking too loudly. According to legal documents, “children aged 16 and 17, many of whom have mental illnesses, had been kept in solitary confinement for months at a time. Many children exhibited symptoms of suicidal thinking, and jail officials deliberately ignored warnings about children’s vulnerabilities, returning juveniles to solitary even after being placed on suicide watch for brief periods.”
The settlement reached in June 2017 is expected to last through October 2019 and is subject to court approval. Under the agreement, 16- and 17-year-olds will no longer be housed in an isolation room, known as “the box,” and will only be confined to their cells for brief periods if there is an imminent safety risk that less restrictive measures cannot resolve. In The Syracuse City School district and the Justice Center must also provide access to educational instruction, special education services and an incentive program that encourages positive behavior. Children will receive individualized plans that identify and accommodate special needs, will receive mental health counseling and will be supervised by a multi-disciplinary team trained to work with juveniles.
HISTORY OF LITIGATION
At the time that the litigation was filed in 2016, New York and North Carolina were the only two states where 16 and 17-year olds were automatically charged as adults and locked up in adult jails. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has since signed legislation to raise the age of jurisdiction for most New York youth, but that law will not go into effect until 2017-2018.
To read more about other developments in New York, click here.
As part of the complaint, the NYCLU included the testimony and photographs of Barry Alan Krisberg, an expert in prison conditions from the University of California. Krisberg said the area where youth are house in solitary confinement, known as “the box,” were inhumane and dangerous. The NYCLU argues that solitary confinement violates children’s constitutional rights and that the county school district is violating the their right to an education while they are held at the Justice Center. Read the complaint and the NYCLU press releases from September 2016 and January 2017.
On January 3, 2017, the United States Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in the case, supporting the NYCLU’s position that even brief periods of solitary confinement is dangerous and harmful for youth. The Justice Department’s statement of interest in a lawsuit where the United States is not a party indicates the significant consequences that could arise from the decision in the NYCLU’s case.
On February 22, 2017, U.S. District Court Judge David Hurd granted the NYCLU’s motion for preliminary injunction, preventing the jail from putting youth in 23-hour isolation or using any form of discipline for youth without meaningful social interaction. According to Judge Hurd’s decision and order, the jail must no longer place youth in 23-hour isolation, and any new form of discipline for juveniles must include meaningful social interaction and cannot harm the psychological health of the youth. The injunction is particularly significant because Judge Hurd had to find that the plaintiffs were substantially likely to win their case in order to grant the motion. Read more below.