Why We Should Fight to End Solitary Confinement for Kids
There is a growing national consensus that we must eliminate solitary confinement for children, and that we can do it successfully and safely. The story of Kalief Browder, a young man who took his own life after spending 14 months in solitary as a teen, reached millions through a documentary on Spike TV produced by Jay-Z.
At the federal level, President Obama and the Department of Justice called for a ban on solitary confinement for young people. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention strongly supports efforts to end youth solitary. Many professional organizations including the American Academy of Adolescent and Child Psychiatry, the American Psychological Association, the National Partnership for Juvenile Services, the American Bar Association, and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges support the end of solitary confinement for youth. A bi-partisan group of Senators introduced federal legislation called the MERCY Act – along with a companion bill in the House – that limits the use of solitary confinement for youth in federal custody. Similar bi-partisan legislation was introduced in 2015. Ohio, Massachusetts, Oregon, and other state agencies have drastically cut solitary confinement by adopting more effective way to hold youth accountable in ways that help teach kids skills to respond differently in the future. Other states like California, Colorado, Nebraska, and the District of Columbia have passed laws to limit solitary. Additional states have legislation pending to do the same including Oregon and Connecticut. State facilities in Wisconsin, New York, New Jersey, Ohio, and Tennessee have been sued for putting kids in solitary confinement. The Department of Justice has weighed in with statements of interest, agreeing that putting kids in solitary is harmful and ineffective.
DANGERS OF SOLITARY CONFINEMENT
Solitary confinement is unquestionably one of the most common, damaging, and counterproductive practices that occurs in juvenile justice facilities. Each year, thousands of young people are subjected to solitary confinement in juvenile and adult facilities across the country. Administrators and staff who supervise youth in the juvenile justice system have a fundamental responsibility to ensure the safety and security of the youth in their care. Solitary confinement can cause psychological and emotional harm, trauma, depression, anxiety, and increased risk of self-harm. It can also exacerbate mental illness and post traumatic stress responses suffered by many youth in the juvenile justice system. Sadly, research shows that more than half of youth who commit suicide inside facilities do so in solitary confinement.
Because of limited resources, facility administrators and staff often use solitary confinement for youth with unaddressed mental health, behavioral, or developmental needs. Because youth in solitary confinement don’t have access to behavioral health services, education, and treatment, solitary confinement undermines the very purpose of juvenile justice facilities – rehabilitation.
Solitary confinement is the involuntary placement of a youth alone in a cell, room, or other area for any reason other than as a temporary response to behavior that threatens immediate physical harm. Most youth facilities refer to solitary confinement by different names – seclusion, isolation, segregation, or room confinement.
We want to stop any practice that meets this definition, regardless of what it is labeled.
SOLITARY DOESN’T WORK
Solitary confinement undercuts the primary goal of facility administrators and staff who employ it: preserving the safety and security of an institution. Solitary confinement has a long history as a common tool to respond to youth behavior despite the fact there is no research to prove that it’s actually effective. To the contrary, experience shows that solitary confinement is ineffective at reducing behavioral incidents and may actually increase violent behavior in youth. The Director of the Ohio Department of Youth Services, which dramatically reduced use of solitary confinement in 2015, stated that solitary confinement “does not make facilities safer. It does not prevent violence or reduce assaults on staff and youth; instead, as the department’s data showed, it increases violence.”
In 2012, the U.S. Attorney General’s Task Force on Children Exposed to Violence called for the end of solitary confinement on youth, stating that “[n]owhere is the damaging impact of incarceration on vulnerable children more obvious than when it involves solitary confinement.”
REFORM IS POSSIBLE
Youth corrections systems in Ohio, Indiana, Massachusetts, and Oregon have improved the safety of facilities and decreases violence involving youth and staff by reducing the use of solitary confinement. The Massachusetts Department of Youth Services rarely uses solitary confinement for more than 2 hours and does not use solitary confinement as punishment. The Ohio Department of Youth Services has reduced solitary confinement to an average of under 3 hours.
Many other states and local jurisdictions have taken steps to reform the use of juvenile solitary confinement on youth. Some efforts have taken the form of agency policy change or statewide legislation, others have been in response to litigation and legislation.
The Stop Solitary for Kids mission is to safely end the practice of solitary confinement for youth in juvenile and adult facilities across the country. Stop Solitary for Kids is a national initiative created by four diverse partner organizations with expertise in juvenile justice reform. The partner organizations include advocates, researchers, communications specialists, policy consultants, and facility superintendents and agency administrators of juvenile justice agencies. We focus on developing solutions that can create measurable and lasting change to end solitary. Our work includes public education, research, legislative education, policy reform, improved facility practices, and technical assistance.